:: LEAST I COULD DO FORUM ::: Best Buy's Web site mistakenly offers 52-inch HDTV for $10 - :: LEAST I COULD DO FORUM ::

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

Best Buy's Web site mistakenly offers 52-inch HDTV for $10 Best Buy will not honor $9.99 big-screen TV deal

#1 User is offline   Orelinde Icon

  • I know you are real...
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,255
  • Joined: 22-January 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa, ON
  • Interests:Hobbies: Singing, reading, writing, video games, watching hockey, movies...<br /><br />TV: Two and a Half Men, Weeds, The X-Files, Family Guy, The Most Extreme, Frasier, Robot Chicken, Buffy &amp; Angel, South Park, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Chef at Home, The Clone Wars, Enterprise, Iron Chef America, Trailer Park Boys, The Office, L&amp;O:SVU<br /><br />Music: Seether, Korn, Evanescence, StoneSour, System of a Down, Flyleaf, Apocalyptica, Joe Satriani, Nirvana, Metallica, Tool, Scars on Broadway, Deftones, A Perfect Circle, The Beatles, The Crashtones<br /><br />Favourite Song at the moment: World Ain't Right - Hurt ft. Shaun Morgan

Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:23 AM

http://www.cnn.com/2...ref=mpstoryview

QUOTE
CNN) -- The price of big screen televisions has been coming down, but this was ridiculous.

Early Wednesday morning, BestBuy.com listed a 52-inch Samsung HDTV for $9.99 -- a savings of more than $1600.

As customers jumped on the Web site trying to take advantage of the offer, Best Buy announced it was a "pricing error" and was no longer available.

A recorded message on Best Buy's customer service line told customers "we will not be placing any more orders for this unit," and messages were sent on Twitter apologizing "for any disappointment."

Customers who placed orders early Wednesday were left wondering if they got away with the bargain. Eric VanBergen of Grand Rapids, Michigan, told CNN he snapped one up for $84.79 -- including $70 shipping and taxes -- at 5:30 a.m. Then, he ordered a second.

Dozens of customers were posting to Twitter and Bestbuy.com, saying they also placed often multiple orders.

It appears they are out of luck. In a statement, Best Buy apologized for the mistake but said it would "not be honoring the incorrect price."

Company representatives posted online messages telling customers "All current and previous orders made for the TV at this price on BestBuy.com will be cancelled, and customers will be refunded in full for the purchase."

The company's Web site states Best Buy reserves the right to "revoke offers or correct errors" even if a credit card has already been charged.

The price mix-up gave way to customer frustration as people lost out on the deal of the year. ".bestbuy dang you!!!!" was how VanBergen reacted on Twitter after learning that his two confirmation e-mails from Best Buy were meaningless.

But it appears there is little else they can do. A spokeswoman for the Federal Trade Commission that investigates consumer complaints told CNN "The FTC act bars unfair and deceptive commercial practices." Those would be cases of phony offers or sweepstakes, rather than a mistake, she said.

So the company makes a mistake on their website and say they will not honour the deal. Do you think they should have to give the TVs at the price advertised to those who already put in the order? Or, since it is a mistake and they would lose a crapload of money, it's okay for them to cancel all the orders?
"You laugh at me because I'm different. I laugh at you because you're all the same."
- Jonathan Davis


I find it kind of funny
I find it kind of sad
The dreams in which I'm dying
Are the best I've ever had


You’re so close to me that you nearly died
0

#2 User is offline   Waycos Icon

  • Just plain nuts...
  • Icon
  • Group: SuperModerator
  • Posts: 11,092
  • Joined: 04-February 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY
  • Interests:stuff

Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:25 AM

I think it's ok for them to cancel the order. If they want to offer a small gift card as a "sorry" then that may be the way to go. But to actually honor that deal would be a huge mistake, might even put them out of business if there were enough orders made.
Oldest MOD EVER! ... again.

Stop by the Movie Forum! It's where we have .... stuff... on movies... but no chicks, that's in the DH.
Linky here --> CLICK ME
0

#3 User is offline   Cybercat Icon

  • President of the Cyndi fanclub.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,978
  • Joined: 17-March 04
  • Location:Enschede, NL

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:20 AM

It depends on the country. In some places they would be forced to sell them for the listed price as Dell found out in Taiwan. In the Netherlands where I live they don't have to if the price is obviously wrong. So offering a $499 item for $399 due to a typo would probably mean they'd have to sell it, but a $1999 item accidently priced as $19.99 wouldn't have to be sold like that.
QUOTE
After all, you can't spell slaughter without laughter.

Surprise!
0

#4 User is offline   Joe Dalton Icon

  • Lord and master of all tubesocks.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 11-October 05
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Scuba diving, mountain climbing, gaming, talking in any way shape or form, kicking gnomes, playing chess and anything else that's fun to do.

Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:12 AM

Of course not, everyone with half a brain knew it was a mistake and they tried to take advantage of it and failed. Noone got wronged.
Won't you have some fun with me?

I'll be damned if I'm taking the stairs--the elevator was out of service once, I called in sick - someone with great wisdom.

Clearly you are wrong, proof of this is that you disagree with me.

I'm not crazy, I'm just very creative with my sanity.
0

#5 User is offline   John Jacques Icon

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 15-May 08
  • Interests:Sports, Gaming, Women!

Posted 08 October 2009 - 01:42 AM

This popped up on 4Chan a while ago and some of the people found out within minutes that the bargain wouldn't work rolleyes.gif
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users